CarteaCompare CarsCX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

160 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

225 / 55 / R19

/

4575

4490 mm

1845

1874 mm

1675

1613 mm

2700

2750 mm

Fuel Economy

14.4

/

58

/

Comfort

/

Remote Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Pedestrian Brake

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

/

151 BHP - 188 BHP

153 BHP - 305 BHP

6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5 Seater

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5L

/

Gasoline

Electric

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

188 HP

153 BHP

188 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

252

340 Nm

252 Nm @ 4000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS has a fuel consumption of 6.94, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS has a wheelbase of 2700, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.