CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

190 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

235/50 R20

/

4740

4275 mm

1890

1765 mm

1688

1535 mm

2870

2570 mm

/

240 L

Fuel Economy

15.4

15.4 Km/L

58

48 L

/

15.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

Rear View Camera

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake

/

/

/

/

Speed Alert DSA: Display Only

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.3 L

2.0 L

280 BHP

145 BHP - 148 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

Piano Black Honey-Comb

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Rear Bumper Guard

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

3.3L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)

/

280 HP

148 BHP

284 PS @ 5000 RPM

/

450

192 Nm

450 NM @ 2000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • CX3 2.0L GT (FWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX3 2.0L GT (FWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI if you care more about interior space; choose CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.