CarteaCompare CarsCX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

235/50 R20

/

4740

4771 mm

1890

1870 mm

1688

1828 mm

2870

2790 mm

Fuel Economy

15.4

10 Km/L

58

/

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Rear View Camera

/

Electric

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake

/

/

/

/

Speed Alert DSA: Display Only

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.3 L - 3.3 L

2.0 L

280 HP - 284 BHP

215 BHP

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 7 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

Piano Black Honey-Comb

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Rear Bumper Guard

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

3.3L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)

/

280 HP

215 BHP

284 PS @ 5000 RPM

/

450

280 Nm

450 NM @ 2000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.