CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
235/50 R20
/
4740
4440 mm
1890
1833 mm
1688
1560 mm
2870
2700 mm
/
330 L
Fuel Economy
15.4
13.5 Km/L
58
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rear View Camera
✓
Electric
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Speed Alert DSA: Display Only
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
1.8 L
280 HP - 284 BHP
130 BHP - 133 BHP
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
Piano Black Honey-Comb
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Bumper Guard
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.3L
1.8 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
280 HP
130 BHP
284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
450
170 Nm
450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.