CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
275/45 R21
/
5120
4490 mm
1994
1874 mm
1736
1613 mm
3120
2750 mm
Fuel Economy
14.3/14.6
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Rear Camera With Dynamic Lines
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
Power Door Lock
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
BOSE
/
Transmission
✓
/
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
/
340 HP - 345 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 - 8
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
Piano Black
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Bumper Moulding: Bright
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.3L
/
Hybrid
Electric
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
340 HP
305 BHP
345 PS @ 5000 RPM \ 284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
500 /450
680 Nm
500 NM @ 2000 RPM \ 450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM has a wheelbase of 3120, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.