CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
275/45 R21
/
5120
4440 mm
1994
1833 mm
1736
1560 mm
3120
2700 mm
/
330 L
Fuel Economy
14.3/14.6
13.5 Km/L
74
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Rear Camera With Dynamic Lines
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
Power Door Lock
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
BOSE
/
Transmission
✓
/
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L
1.8 L
345 BHP
130 BHP - 132 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
Piano Black
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Bumper Moulding: Bright
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.3L
1.8 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
340 HP
130 BHP
345 PS @ 5000 RPM \ 284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
500 /450
170 Nm
500 NM @ 2000 RPM \ 450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM has a wheelbase of 3120, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.