CX5 Entry vs 03T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

/

17

/

4550

/

1840

/

1675

/

2700

/

965

/

Fuel Economy

/

/

56

/

/

/

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

Safety

6

/

✓

/

Infotainment

✓

/

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 2500 L

TBD

188 BHP - 190 BHP

TBD

6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

TBD

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Engine

2.5 L

/

Gasoline

/

190 BHP

/

251 Nm

/

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 Entry

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
  • 03T

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's Pick03T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about overall equipment; choose 03T if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mazda | CX5 Entry

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Macan 2021 Base

    Mazda | CX5 Entry

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Macan 2022 Base

    Mazda | CX5 Entry

    VS

    Kia | Kia Sonet 2024 1.5L EX2

    Mazda | CX5 Entry

    VS

    Kia | Sportage G1.6 T-GDi

    Mazda | CX5 Entry

    VS

    Peugeot | NEW 2008

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while 03T has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while 03T has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while 03T uses No data.