CX5 Entry vs Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
/
4.5
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200
/
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4550
4.880
1840
1.970
1675
1.601
2700
2.975
965
489
Fuel Economy
/
/
56
/
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
680
Safety
6
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2500 L
/
188 BHP - 190 BHP
570 BHP
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
190 BHP
570 BHP
251 Nm
650
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Double
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAvatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about interior space; choose Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a wheelbase of 2.975. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX5 Entry, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.