CX5 Entry vs Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

17

16

4550

4200

1840

1760

1675

1570

2700

2555

965

341

/

Flush Door

/

5

Fuel Economy

/

/

56

/

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Cloth

/

/

/

Safety

6

Dual Front Airbags

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

4

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

151 BHP - 190 BHP

109 BHP - 113

6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

190 BHP

111 BHP

251 Nm

/

/

1.5L

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

ECO, Normal

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 Entry

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
  • Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Renault | Renault Koleos 2023 2.5L LE (4WD)

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Geely | Geely Monjaro 2024 2.0TD Premium GF (4WD)

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX5 Entry, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive.