CX5 Entry vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

185km/h

/

4

/

1598 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

17

20"

4550

4724

1840

1900

1675

1720

2700

2720

965

480 L

/

5 Doors

/

210 mm

Fuel Economy

/

13 Km/L

56

57 L

/

13 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

4 Way

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic

7DCT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

MacPherson

/

Multi Link

/

EPS

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated

/

Disc

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

1.6 L - 1.6 L

151 BHP - 188 BHP

197 - 197

6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic

7DCT & Automatic & DCT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

1.6T

Gasoline

Gasoline

190 BHP

197

251 Nm

290

/

In-Line

/

Turbocharge

/

4

/

5500

/

4000

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 Entry

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
  • X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Rollover stability control
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Stylish and attractive exterior design
  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Excellent financial value for money for features

Negative

  • The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
  • The suspension system needs better tuning
  • Noise control is poor on highways

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX5 Entry

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price; choose X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV)

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Honda | HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro Max COM

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.