CX5 High vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

252

/

/

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

19 Inch

/

4550 mm

5209

1840 mm

2010

1680 mm

1731

2700 mm

3110

965 L

/

Fuel Economy

/

/

58

/

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12 Inch

/

/

10

/

/

/

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

/

151 BHP - 190 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

6 - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

190 BHP

429 BHP

251 Nm

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 High

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX5 High

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX5 High if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Teramont 2022 2.0L Trendline (AWD)

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD)

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 5008 2022 1.6T GT Line

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 5008 2021 1.6T GT Line

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Nissan | Nissan Xterra 2022 2.5L Titanium (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 High has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX5 High has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 High uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.