CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs Mohave 3.8L Base Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075 mm
4880 mm
1969 mm
1915 mm
1716 mm
1810 mm
2930 mm
2895 mm
407 L
331 L
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
7.9 Km/L
74 L
82 L
11.8 Km/L
7.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
3.8 L - 4.6 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
270 BHP - 342 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
270 BHP
420 Nm
362 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Mohave 3.8L Base
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMohave 3.8L Base
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mohave 3.8L Base if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Mohave 3.8L Base has a fuel consumption of 12.66. Therefore, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while Mohave 3.8L Base has a wheelbase of 2895 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Mohave 3.8L Base uses All Wheel Drive.