CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) vs CX60 2025 High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075 mm
4740
1969 mm
1890
1716 mm
1686
2930 mm
/
407 L
/
/
20 Inch
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
/
74 L
/
11.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12 Inch
/
✓
/
12
/
Bose
Transmission
/
8-speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2500 L
3.3 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
280 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
284 BHP
420 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GT (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
CX60 2025 High Plus
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX60 2025 High Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX60 2025 High Plus if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while CX60 2025 High Plus uses Four-Wheel Drive.