CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075 mm
4950 mm
1969 mm
1930 mm
1716 mm
1730 mm
2930 mm
2850 mm
407 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
20 Km/L
74 L
65 L
11.8 Km/L
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
230 BHP
240 BHP
420 Nm
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GT (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX9 2.5T GT (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.