CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) vs RAV4 2.5L Adventure Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075 mm
4610 mm
1969 mm
1865 mm
1716 mm
1690 mm
2930 mm
2660 mm
407 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
14.4 Km/L
74 L
55 L
11.8 Km/L
14.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
170 - 219
Automatic
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
203 BHP
420 Nm
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GT (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
RAV4 2.5L Adventure
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX9 2.5T GT (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) if you care more about price; choose RAV4 2.5L Adventure if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while RAV4 2.5L Adventure has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, RAV4 2.5L Adventure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while RAV4 2.5L Adventure has a wheelbase of 2660 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while RAV4 2.5L Adventure uses Four Wheel Drive.