Roewe D5X Comfort vs BJ40 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

120

/

21.4

/

Engine / Motor

200

200 km/h

/

4

/

1981 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

18"

/

4,700

4645 mm

1,890

1925 mm

1,664

1871 mm

2,765

2745 mm

/

5 Doors

/

532 L

/

220 m

Fuel Economy

21.6 km/L.

10 Km/L

50

75 L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

Passenger Seat

/

fabric

Leather

/

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

24.6"

10.25

/

Standard LCD

/

/

6

6

/

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four Wheel Drive

MacPherson Independent

/

Rear Multi-link Independent

/

Key Spec

1.5T

2.0 L

141 + 181

218 BHP

AT

Automatic

Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Halogen

/

/

/

Engine

1.5T

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

141 + 181

218 BHP

230 + 340

320 Nm

/

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Motor

340

/

Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery

/

181

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comfort / Standard / Sport

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Roewe D5X Comfort

    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • BJ40 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRoewe D5X Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Roewe D5X Comfort if you care more about price; choose BJ40 2.0T if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

ROEWE | Roewe D5X Comfort

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

ROEWE | Roewe D5X Comfort

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

ROEWE | Roewe D5X Comfort

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

ROEWE | Roewe D5X Comfort

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

ROEWE | Roewe D5X Comfort

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Roewe D5X Comfort has a fuel consumption of 4.63, while BJ40 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Roewe D5X Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Roewe D5X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2,765, while BJ40 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2745 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Roewe D5X Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Roewe D5X Comfort uses Front Drive, while BJ40 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.