Roewe D5X Comfort vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

120

/

21.4

/

Engine / Motor

200

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

18"

/

4,700

4760 mm

1,890

1907 mm

1,664

1700 mm

2,765

2870 mm

/

4 Doors

/

453 L

/

130 m

Fuel Economy

21.6 km/L.

7.1 Km/L

50

64 L

/

7.1 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

Passenger Seat

/

fabric

Leather

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

24.6"

12.3

/

Android LCD

/

6

12

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

MacPherson Independent

/

Rear Multi-link Independent

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5T

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

141 + 181

221 BHP

230 + 340

340 Nm

/

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Motor

340

/

Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery

/

181

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comfort / Standard / Sport

/

/

Key Spec

/

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

224 BHP - 252 BHP

/

8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic

/

Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

5 Seater

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Roewe D5X Comfort

    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • HS5 Basic 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHS5 Basic 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Roewe D5X Comfort if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Roewe D5X Comfort has a fuel consumption of 4.63, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, Roewe D5X Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Roewe D5X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2,765, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Basic 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Roewe D5X Comfort uses Front Drive, while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.