Roewe D5X Comfort vs Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
205 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18"
/
4,700
4855 mm
1,890
1860 mm
1,664
1465 mm
2,765
2805 mm
/
450 L
Fuel Economy
21.6 km/L.
11.8 Km/L
50
70 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Passenger Seat
/
fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
24.6"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson Independent
/
Rear Multi-link Independent
/
Key Spec
1.5T
2.0 L - 2.5 L
141 + 181
157 BHP - 265 BHP
AT
AT & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
141 + 181
240 BHP
230 + 340
350 Nm
✓
/
Motor
340
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery
/
181
/
Technologies
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort / Standard / Sport
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Roewe D5X Comfort
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.0L T-GDI GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Roewe D5X Comfort if you care more about fuel economy; choose Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Roewe D5X Comfort has a fuel consumption of 4.63, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, Roewe D5X Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Roewe D5X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2,765, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Roewe D5X Comfort uses Front Drive, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT uses Front Wheel Drive.