Roewe D5X Comfort vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
185 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18"
/
4,700
4781 mm
1,890
1920 mm
1,664
1671 mm
2,765
2815 mm
/
5 Doors
/
500 L
/
187 m
Fuel Economy
21.6 km/L.
16 Km/L
50
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Passenger Seat
/
fabric
Leather
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
24.6"
12.3
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson Independent
/
Rear Multi-link Independent
/
Key Spec
1.5T
2.0 L - 2.0 L
141 + 181
245 HP - 261 BHP
AT
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
141 + 181
261 BHP
230 + 340
400 Nm
✓
/
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
340
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery
/
181
/
Technologies
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort / Standard / Sport
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Roewe D5X Comfort
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Roewe D5X Comfort if you care more about price; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Roewe D5X Comfort has a fuel consumption of 4.63, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, Roewe D5X Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Roewe D5X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2,765, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX Comfort 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Roewe D5X Comfort uses Front Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.