D90 Pro Elite 2WD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
7
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
5005
4760 mm
1932
1930 mm
1875
1927 mm
2950
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Front Airbag-Driver ,Front Airbag-Passenger, Driver's & Front Passenger's Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
5Bar Lin Spir Spring Rr Suspen
/
Wheels/brakes
255/60 R18
/
255/60 R18
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L
161 BHP - 214
223 BHP - 342 BHP
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Diesel
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Diesel
Gasoline
2.0T Diesel Engine
/
161 BHP
224 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport/Normal/Eco
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
D90 Pro Elite 2WD
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Alert
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose D90 Pro Elite 2WD if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, D90 Pro Elite 2WD has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, D90 Pro Elite 2WD has a wheelbase of 2950, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, D90 Pro Elite 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. D90 Pro Elite 2WD uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.