Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1590 cc
3490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4590 mm
5115 mm
1900 mm
1980 mm
1685 mm
1920 mm
2720 mm
2890 mm
160 mm
221 m
/
1004 L
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
57 L
110 L
12 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
15.6
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
154 - 197 BHP
240 BHP - 409
6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
1.6 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Twin Turbo
4
4
194 BHP
271 BHP
290 Nm
385 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dashing 1.6L Turbo
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Dashing 1.6L Turbo is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.