Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1590 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4590 mm
4549
1900 mm
1860
1685 mm
1689
2720 mm
2734
160 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
14.9
57 L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
2.0 L
154 - 197 BHP
216 BHP - 217 BHP
6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
194 BHP
216 BHP
290 Nm
325
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dashing 1.6L Turbo
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about overall equipment; choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.