Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1590 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4590 mm
4570 mm
1900 mm
1845 mm
1685 mm
1660 mm
2720 mm
2660 mm
160 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
57 L
55 L
12 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
154 - 197 BHP
170 - 219
6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
None
4
4
194 BHP
203 BHP
290 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dashing 1.6L Turbo
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about interior space; choose RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX has a wheelbase of 2660 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dashing 1.6L Turbo, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX uses Front Wheel Drive.