CarteaCompare CarsDashing 1.6L Turbo vs Suzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid

Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs Suzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

180

4

4

1590 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4590 mm

3.995

1900 mm

1.765

1685 mm

1.55

2720 mm

2.52

160 mm

/

/

304

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

57 L

37

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.6 L

1.5 L

154 - 197 BHP

103 BHP - 104 BHP

6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.6 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

None

/

4

/

194 BHP

/

290 Nm

136.8

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Suzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Integrated interior fittings
  • Excellent value for the price

Negative

  • Engine performance needs improvement
  • Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
  • The suspension is solid off-road

Positive

  • Modern and modern exterior design
  • Excellent fuel efficiency;
  • Low maintenance cost

Negative

  • Limited dynamic performance
  • Suspension comfort needs to be improved
  • Interior fittings are limited by technologies

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSuzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about interior space; choose Suzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Suzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while Suzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2.52. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dashing 1.6L Turbo, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while Suzuki Fronx 2024 Suzuki Fronx 2024 1.5L GLX Hybrid uses Front Wheel Drive.