Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs T2 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
1590 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4590 mm
4785 mm
1900 mm
2006 mm
1685 mm
1880 mm
2720 mm
2800 mm
160 mm
220 mm
/
752 L
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
11 Km/L
57 L
70 L
12 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
15.6
15.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
12
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
2.0 L
154 - 197 BHP
250 - 380 BHP
6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic & DHT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Twin Turbo
4
4
194 BHP
250 BHP
290 Nm
390 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dashing 1.6L Turbo
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
T2 Standard
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about price; choose T2 Standard if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while T2 Standard has a fuel consumption of 100. Therefore, Dashing 1.6L Turbo is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while T2 Standard has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T2 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while T2 Standard uses Four Wheel Drive.