Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs Jetour X50 Flagship Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1590 cc

1498

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4590 mm

4397

1900 mm

1841

1685 mm

1654

2720 mm

2601

160 mm

/

/

18

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

57 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Faux Leather

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

10.25

/

/

Android LCD

/

8

6

/

/

Transmission

/

6-DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

Macpherson independent suspension

/

Multiple link independent suspension

/

EPS

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Ventilated

/

Disc

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.6 L

1.5 L

154 - 197 BHP

154 BHP - 156

6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic

6-DCT

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.6 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

None

/

4

/

194 BHP

156

290 Nm

230

/

Turbocharge

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Jetour X50 Flagship

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Integrated interior fittings
  • Excellent value for the price

Negative

  • Engine performance needs improvement
  • Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
  • The suspension is solid off-road

Positive

  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Advanced technologies for security systems
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average fuel efficiency
  • The availability of spare parts can be limited
  • Less dynamic driving experience

Related comparisons

Editor's PickJetour X50 Flagship

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about interior space; choose Jetour X50 Flagship if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Jetour X50 Flagship has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while Jetour X50 Flagship has a wheelbase of 2601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dashing 1.6L Turbo, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while Jetour X50 Flagship uses Front Drive.