CarteaCompare CarsDashing 1.6T Luxury 2026 vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026 vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison

Car Information

/

10.9

/

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

170

4

4

1590 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4590 mm

4.314

1900 mm

1.809

1685 mm

1.624

2720 mm

2.585

160 mm

/

/

/

448

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

17.2

57 L

48

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.6 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

154 - 197 BHP

112 BHP - 168

6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.6 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Petrol

None

/

4

/

194 BHP

112 BHP

290 Nm

150

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Integrated interior fittings
  • Excellent value for the price

Negative

  • Engine performance needs improvement
  • Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
  • The suspension is solid off-road

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDashing 1.6T Luxury 2026

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026 if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Jetour | Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Jetour | Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Jetour | Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Jetour | Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026 has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026 has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6T Luxury 2026 uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.