DBS 5.2T V12 vs LC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
340 km/h
280 km/h
/
8
/
7850 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4 Seater
4 Seater
4712 mm
4770 mm
1942 mm
1920 mm
1280 mm
1345 mm
2805 mm
2870 mm
/
2 Doors
/
300 L
/
135 m
Fuel Economy
8.2 Km/L
5 Km/L
8.2 Km/L
5 Km/L
/
82 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
5.2 L
5.0 L
715 BHP - 770 BHP
471 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
4 Seater
Engine
5.2 L
5.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
715 BHP
471 BHP
900 Nm
540 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DBS 5.2T V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
LC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DBS 5.2T V12 if you care more about fuel economy; choose LC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DBS 5.2T V12 has a fuel consumption of 12.2, while LC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L has a fuel consumption of 20. Therefore, DBS 5.2T V12 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DBS 5.2T V12 has a wheelbase of 2805 mm, while LC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, LC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DBS 5.2T V12 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while LC500 Convertible Titanium 5.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.