DBS 5.2T V12 vs RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
340 km/h
260 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4 Seater
4 Seater
4712 mm
4700 mm
1942 mm
1840 mm
1280 mm
1395 mm
2805 mm
2730 mm
/
2 Doors
/
300 L
/
135 m
Fuel Economy
8.2 Km/L
7 Km/L
8.2 Km/L
7 Km/L
/
66 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
5.2 L
/
715 BHP - 770 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
4 Seater
/
Engine
5.2 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
715 BHP
312 BHP
900 Nm
377 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DBS 5.2T V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DBS 5.2T V12 if you care more about fuel economy; choose RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DBS 5.2T V12 has a fuel consumption of 12.2, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, DBS 5.2T V12 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DBS 5.2T V12 has a wheelbase of 2805 mm, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2730 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DBS 5.2T V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DBS 5.2T V12 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L uses All Wheel Drive.