DBS 5.2T V12 vs RS e-tron GT Comparison

Car Information

/

2.5

/

592

Engine / Motor

340 km/h

/

Dimensions

4 Seater

5

4712 mm

/

1942 mm

/

1280 mm

/

2805 mm

/

Fuel Economy

8.2 Km/L

/

8.2 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Safety

/

Transmission

/

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

5.2 L

/

715 BHP - 770 BHP

925 BHP

Automatic

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

4 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Engine

5.2 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

715 BHP

925 BHP

900 Nm

/

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • DBS 5.2T V12

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • RS e-tron GT

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickDBS 5.2T V12

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose DBS 5.2T V12 if you care more about price; choose RS e-tron GT if you care more about power.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Aston Martin | DBS 5.2T V12

    VS

    McLaren | McLaren 540C 2022 3.8T Coupe

    Aston Martin | DBS 5.2T V12

    VS

    McLaren | McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe

    Aston Martin | DBS 5.2T V12

    VS

    McLaren | McLaren 540C 2021 3.8T Coupe

    Aston Martin | DBS 5.2T V12

    VS

    McLaren | McLaren 540C 2016 Coupe

    Aston Martin | DBS 5.2T V12

    VS

    McLaren | McLaren 540C 2023 McLaren 540C 2023 3.8T Coupe

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, DBS 5.2T V12 has a fuel consumption of 12.2, while RS e-tron GT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, DBS 5.2T V12 has a wheelbase of 2805 mm, while RS e-tron GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DBS 5.2T V12 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while RS e-tron GT uses No data.