DBX 4.0T V8 vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
291 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5039 mm
4341 mm
2050 mm
1804 mm
1680 mm
1693 mm
3060 mm
2676 mm
632 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
85 L
50 L
7 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
542 BHP - 707 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
4.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
542 BHP
115 BHP
700 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
DBX 4.0T V8
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DBX 4.0T V8 if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DBX 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DBX 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3060 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DBX 4.0T V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DBX 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.