Defender 110 HSE (P400) vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
208 km/h
193 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5018 mm
4355 mm
2008 mm
1810 mm
1965 mm
1625 mm
3022 mm
2670 mm
/
358 L
Fuel Economy
10.1 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
90 L
63 L
10.1 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
300 BHP - 635
150 - 150
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 8 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
3.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400 BHP
150 BHP
550 Nm
197 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 110 HSE (P400)
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 110 HSE (P400) if you care more about interior space; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a wheelbase of 3022 mm, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Defender 110 HSE (P400), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 110 HSE (P400) uses All Wheel Drive, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.