CarteaCompare CarsDefender 110 HSE (P400) vs G9 RWD Standard Range

Defender 110 HSE (P400) vs G9 RWD Standard Range Comparison

Car Information

/

6.6

/

460 kM

/

78.2 kWh

Engine / Motor

208 km/h

200

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

5

5018 mm

4891

2008 mm

1937

1965 mm

1680

3022 mm

2998

/

2235

/

19

/

660/1576 Front Trunk 71L

Fuel Economy

10.1 Km/L

/

90 L

/

10.1 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Electric

Interior

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Digital

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

Front And Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.96

/

14.96

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

/

CCS2

/

20min = 10-80% SOC

/

up to 260

/

≥9h

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Multi-link Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

255/55R19

/

255/55R19

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

/

300 BHP - 635

310 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 8 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

460

Engine

3.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

400 BHP

310 BHP

550 Nm

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

430

/

1

/

LFP

/

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

/

230

/

310

Technologies

/

/

5

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    • G9 RWD Standard Range

      • Power Tailgate
      • Welcome Light
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Heater
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
      • Front Cross Traffic Alert
      • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • Intelligent Emergency Call
      • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
      • ABS
      • EBA/BA
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Lane Departure Warning
      • Lane Keeping Assist
      • Seat belt reminder

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickG9 RWD Standard Range

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 110 HSE (P400) if you care more about interior space; choose G9 RWD Standard Range if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q7 2024 55 TFSI quattro S-line (340 HP)

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Maserati | Levante 3.0T V6 Modena

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Levante 2022 3.0T V6 Modena

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Levante 2021 3.0T V6 S

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Levante 2020 3.0T V6 S

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a wheelbase of 3022 mm, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2998. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Defender 110 HSE (P400), offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 110 HSE (P400) uses All Wheel Drive, while G9 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.