Defender 110 HSE (P400) vs Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

208 km/h

210 km/h

/

3460 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

5 Doors

5 Doors

5018 mm

5115 mm

2008 mm

1980 mm

1965 mm

1920 mm

3022 mm

2850 mm

/

1004 L

/

235 mm

Fuel Economy

10.1 Km/L

9.3 Km/L

90 L

110 L

10.1 Km/L

9.3 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5.0 L

3.3 L - 5.7 L

300 BHP - 517 BHP

240 BHP - 409

Automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 8 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Engine

3.0 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

400 BHP

409 BHP

550 Nm

650 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    • Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Powerful off-road capabilities
    • Exceptional reliability and durability
    • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickDefender 110 HSE (P400)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 110 HSE (P400) if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    BMW | BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i M Sport

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    BMW | BMW X4 2023 xDrive 30i M Sport

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 2.0L R-Dynamic HSE (300 PS)

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2024 2.0L R-Dynamic HSE (300 PS)

    Land Rover | Defender 110 HSE (P400)

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2019 Diesel Platinum

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, Defender 110 HSE (P400) is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a wheelbase of 3022 mm, while Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Defender 110 HSE (P400), offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 110 HSE (P400) uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.