Defender 110 HSE (P400) vs Nissan Patrol Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
208 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
5 Doors
/
5018 mm
/
2008 mm
/
1965 mm
/
3022 mm
/
Fuel Economy
10.1 Km/L
14.4 L/100km
90 L
/
10.1 Km/L
/
Transmission
/
9-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
300 BHP - 635
275 BHP - 495 BHP
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 8 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Engine
3.0 L
3.5L (Twin-Turbo) or 3.8L (Naturally Aspirated)
Gasoline
Gasoline
400 BHP
425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
550 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 110 HSE (P400)
Nissan Patrol
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNissan Patrol
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 110 HSE (P400) if you care more about power; choose Nissan Patrol if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while Nissan Patrol has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, Nissan Patrol is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 110 HSE (P400) has a wheelbase of 3022 mm, while Nissan Patrol has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 110 HSE (P400) uses All Wheel Drive, while Nissan Patrol uses No data.