CarteaCompare CarsDefender 90 SE Base (P300) vs Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

Defender 90 SE Base (P300) vs Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

191 km/h

180 km/h

/

4

/

2393 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4583 mm

4925 mm

2008 mm

1980 mm

1969 mm

1935 mm

2587 mm

2850 mm

397 L

104 L

/

5 Doors

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

10.6 Km/L

88.5 L

110 L

10 Km/L

10.6 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

3-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

10

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

2.4 L - 2.4 L

300 BHP - 635

201 - 267 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

8 Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Gasoline

Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 8 Seater

7 Seater - 7 Seater

Engine

2.0 L

2.4 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

300 BHP

267 BHP

400 Nm

430 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    • Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • Strong performance in rough terrain
    • Reliability and durability
    • Spacious and comfortable interior

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High maintenance and repair costs
    • Traditional interior design

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickPrado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 90 SE Base (P300) if you care more about power; choose Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Toyota | Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Toyota | Prado Adventure Mono Tone 2.4T

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T has a fuel consumption of 9.43. Therefore, Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE Base (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T uses Four Wheel Drive.