DENALI 3.6L vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

7

5

22"

18

4,883

4500

1,939

1842

1,805

1746

2,858

2670

/

Flush Door

/

5

Fuel Economy

9-10

16.6

71

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

/

Front and Back Row Seats

Driver Seat

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

12.3

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

Safety

/

Forward Collision Alert

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

6

BOSE

/

/

12.3

/

/

Transmission

9-speed automatic

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Lifted Suspension

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.6 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

288 BHP - 328 BHP

154 - 197 BHP

8-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic & Automatic

6DCT AT & 7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT) & 7DCT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.6L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Naturally Aspirated

/

310 HP

197 BHP

366 Nm

290

/

1.6L TDGI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • DENALI 3.6L

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDENALI 3.6L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose DENALI 3.6L if you care more about price; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

GMC | DENALI 3.6L

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

GMC | DENALI 3.6L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

GMC | DENALI 3.6L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

GMC | DENALI 3.6L

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

GMC | DENALI 3.6L

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, DENALI 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, DENALI 3.6L has a wheelbase of 2,858, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DENALI 3.6L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DENALI 3.6L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.