DFSK C31 Standard vs DFSK C32 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
2
5
1100
1172
14"
14"
4730
4940
1655
1655
1960
1910
3050
3050
2900x1540x370
2060x1540x370
/
/
2295
2295
Fuel Economy
18
18
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
Manual
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Independent Suspension
Macpherson Independent Suspension
Five-bar Rear Non-independent Suspension
Five-bar Rear Non-independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
Disc
Disc
Drum
Drum
175 R14 LT
175 R14 LT
175 R14 LT
175 R14 LT
Key Spec
1.5
1.5
129
114
Manual
Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
Naturally Aspirated
129
114
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C31 Standard
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
DFSK C32 Standard
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDFSK C32 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C31 Standard if you care more about power; choose DFSK C32 Standard if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C31 Standard has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while DFSK C32 Standard has a fuel consumption of 5.56. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C31 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while DFSK C32 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C31 Standard uses Rear Drive, while DFSK C32 Standard uses Rear Drive.