DFSK C31 Standard vs JAC T8 Pro Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
2
5
1100
1970
14"
18" aluminium alloy, 265/60 R18
4730
5325
1655
1880
1960
1830
3050
3090
2900x1540x370
1520 x 1520 x 470
/
/
2295
900
/
2970
/
6.2 m
/
210
Fuel Economy
18
/
/
76
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
Remote key
/
Tilt adjustable
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
7" colour multi-information display
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Yes
✓
Yes - TCS
/
2
/
Yes - original-size spare tyre
/
Yes - VDC/ESC
/
Yes - HBA
/
Yes - VDC/ESC
/
Yes
Infotainment
/
10.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Manual
6-Speed AT
/
Automatic transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Independent Suspension
Double wishbone independent with coil spring
Five-bar Rear Non-independent Suspension
Non-independent rear leaf spring
/
Electric power assisted steering
Wheels/brakes
Disc
Disc
Drum
Disc
175 R14 LT
265/60 R18
175 R14 LT
265/60 R18
/
Yes
Key Spec
1.5
2
129
TBD
Manual
6-Speed AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Auto Xenon
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
129
/
/
2.0TGDI
/
Yes
/
5500
/
380
/
1900-3300
/
Gasoline Direct Injection
/
Euro V
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C31 Standard
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
JAC T8 Pro
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Parking sensor rear
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C31 Standard if you care more about overall equipment; choose JAC T8 Pro if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C31 Standard has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while JAC T8 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C31 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while JAC T8 Pro has a wheelbase of 3090. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, JAC T8 Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C31 Standard uses Rear Drive, while JAC T8 Pro uses No data.