DFSK C35 Standard vs Partner 1.6L Long (Petrol) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
140
/
1499
/
Dimensions
2
3 Seater
14"
/
4500
4753 mm
1680
1848 mm
1985
1849 mm
3050
2728 mm
800
/
/
options.3,900 L
Fuel Economy
15.5
14.3 Km/L
55L
60 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
/
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
/
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
110 BHP
148
150 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
0.0 L - 1.6 L
/
92 BHP - 136 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
2 - 3 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Partner 1.6L Long (Petrol)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPartner 1.6L Long (Petrol)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose Partner 1.6L Long (Petrol) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Partner 1.6L Long (Petrol) has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while Partner 1.6L Long (Petrol) has a wheelbase of 2728 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C35 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive, while Partner 1.6L Long (Petrol) uses Front Wheel Drive.