DFSK C35 Standard vs Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
140
170 km/h
1499
2490 cc
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
2
3 Seater
14"
/
4500
4695 mm
1680
1695 mm
1985
1990 mm
3050
2555 mm
800
/
/
4 Doors
/
195 m
Fuel Economy
15.5
8.3 Km/L
55L
65 L
/
8.3 Km/L
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
/
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.5 L - 2.5 L
114
147 BHP - 147 BHP
5MT
Automatic & Automatic CVTS & Manual & Manual CVTS
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2
3 Seater - 15 Seater
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
147 BHP
148
213 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDFSK C35 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about price; choose Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) has a wheelbase of 2555 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C35 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive, while Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) uses Rear Wheel Drive.