DFSK Fengon 500 vs BJ30e Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
50
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5T
1.5 L - 1.5 L
156
154 BHP - 185
AT
7DCT & DHT & DHT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
156
154 BHP
220
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK Fengon 500
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
BJ30e
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBJ30e
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK Fengon 500 if you care more about power; choose BJ30e if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK Fengon 500 has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while BJ30e has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK Fengon 500 has a wheelbase of No data, while BJ30e has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK Fengon 500 uses Front Drive, while BJ30e uses No data.