DFSK Fengon 500 vs CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
17"
/
/
4949 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1790 mm
/
2810 mm
Fuel Economy
13.9
10.5 Km/L
50
74 L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5T
2.0 L - 2.0 L
156
233 - 233
AT
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
156
233 BHP
220
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK Fengon 500
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDFSK Fengon 500
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK Fengon 500 if you care more about price; choose CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK Fengon 500 has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, DFSK Fengon 500 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK Fengon 500 has a wheelbase of No data, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK Fengon 500 uses Front Drive, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.