DFSK Fengon 500 vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
/
4341 mm
/
1804 mm
/
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
13.9
17.2 Km/L
50
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5T
1.6 L - 2.0 L
156
105 BHP - 135 BHP
AT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5T
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
156
115 BHP
220
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK Fengon 500
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK Fengon 500 if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK Fengon 500 has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK Fengon 500 has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK Fengon 500 uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.