DFSK Fengon 500 vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
17"
/
/
5 Doors
/
4950 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1730 mm
/
2850 mm
Fuel Economy
13.9
20 Km/L
50
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5T
2.5 L - 2.5 L
156
240 BHP - 240 BHP
AT
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
156
240 BHP
220
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK Fengon 500
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDFSK Fengon 500
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK Fengon 500 if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK Fengon 500 has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK Fengon 500 has a wheelbase of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK Fengon 500 uses Front Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.