DFSK Fengon 500 vs X50 LUX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
17
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
50
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
4
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
10.25
/
6
Transmission
AT
6-DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5T
1.5 L
156
154 BHP - 156
AT
6-DCT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
156
154 BHP
220
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK Fengon 500
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
X50 LUX
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technologies for security systems
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average fuel efficiency
- The availability of spare parts can be limited
- Less dynamic driving experience
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX50 LUX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK Fengon 500 if you care more about power; choose X50 LUX if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK Fengon 500 has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while X50 LUX has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK Fengon 500 has a wheelbase of No data, while X50 LUX has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK Fengon 500 uses Front Drive, while X50 LUX uses No data.