Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) vs EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
225 km/h
180 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4599 mm
4684 mm
2069 mm
2020 mm
1724 mm
1667 mm
2741 mm
2,829 mm
981 L
495 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.5 Km/L
/
67 L
/
14.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
249 BHP
288 BHP
365 Nm
520 Nm
Motor
/
9
/
options.Lithium
/
215 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) has a wheelbase of 2741 mm, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.