DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD vs Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
182 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5325 mm
5330 mm
1870 mm
1963 mm
1790 mm
1897 mm
3125 mm
3180 mm
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
10.2 Km/L
76 L
80 L
12.5 Km/L
10.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 2999 L
2.4 L
190 BHP
210 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Diesel
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
3.0 L
2.4 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
210 BHP
450 Nm
320 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD
- ABS
Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLandtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD has a fuel consumption of 8, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD has a wheelbase of 3125 mm, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a wheelbase of 3180 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) uses Rear Wheel Drive.