DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD vs Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
6 Seater
5325 mm
5336 mm
1870 mm
2075 mm
1790 mm
1758 mm
3125 mm
3150 mm
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
8.3 Km/L
76 L
80 L
12.5 Km/L
8.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.9 L - 3.0 L
2.5 L
79 BHP - 190 BHP
158 BHP - 168 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Diesel
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
2.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
158 BHP
450 Nm
233 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD
- ABS
Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNavara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD has a fuel consumption of 8, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD has a wheelbase of 3125 mm, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a wheelbase of 3150 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DMax 3.0L FlatBed 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.