Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Shaker vs Nissan Z MT Proto 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
260 km/h
8
6
/
2996 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
2 Seater
5027
4380 mm
1923
1845 mm
1460
1315 mm
2950
2550 mm
459
/
/
2 Doors
/
125 mm
Fuel Economy
8.1
9.5
70
62 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
/
Double-Wishbone
/
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
3.0 L - 3.0 L
300 BHP - 797 BHP
400 BHP - 420 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Auto & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 5 Seater
2 Seater - 4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
5.7 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
375 BHP
400 BHP
555
475 Nm
/
V
/
3.0-litre twin-turbo V6
/
Twin Turbo
/
24
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Shaker
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Nissan Z MT Proto 3.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Positive
- Power performance V6 dual turbo engine
- Attractive sporty and modern design
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Small luggage storage capacity
- The infotainment system is relatively old
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Shaker if you care more about price; choose Nissan Z MT Proto 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Shaker has a fuel consumption of 12.35, while Nissan Z MT Proto 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, Nissan Z MT Proto 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Shaker has a wheelbase of 2950, while Nissan Z MT Proto 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2550 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Shaker, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Shaker uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Nissan Z MT Proto 3.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive .